Penthouse Letters.com

INFORM NOT ENOUGH: CASE AGAINST Gelmini decree

How Parents' Committee have taken a series of contacts with other similar groups of parents and / or teachers, all committed to the defense of public schools. The Parents' Committee of Florence in recent months has proved very active in this regard. One of his initiative is an appeal against the ministerial circular relating to the registration and, through it, the plan School reorganization that underlies it. Below are a significant excerpt of Appeal (the full text is the site of the Parents' Committee of Florence, www.retescuole.net). In that action, if continued in subsequent judicial offices, will bring its contribution to our Parents' Committee. Anyone interested in supporting this initiative are invited to contact us.

Regional Administrative Court of Lazio
ACTION
(...) Against

Ministry of Education '
AND RESEARCH (now MIUR), in the person of the Minister pro-tempore in
office;
MINISTRY OF ECONOMY AND FINANCE
in the person of the Minister pro-tempore in office
COUNCIL OF MINISTERS, in the person of the President in office protempore


after suspension for the cancellation of the CM
No 4 MIUR prot. No 381/RUU 04 of 15 January 2009
not formally published concerning "
school enrollment of children and schools of all levels, regarding the 2009/2010 school year
" in part on information in the school
childhood and the first cycle, as well as any other act in mind,
connected and consequential, including all acts of implementation, not known

and with regard to any
schema Plan Programmatic
provided by the Ministry of Education, University and Research (now MIUR) in consultation with the Ministry of Economy and Finance
and still
not formally adopted. FACT

(...)
On 03.09.2008, the Ministry of Education in cooperation with the Ministry of Economy and Finance has prepared
scheme
programmatic plan of action "aimed at further rationalization of human resources
and instrumental
available, offering greater effectiveness and efficiency of the education system
"said scheme has been sent to the prescribed
opinions on both the relevant committees Both the parliamentary Joint Conference
art. 8 DL.vo No 281/97. On 27/11/2008 the
VII Commission of the Chamber of Deputies and on 03/12/2008
the Commission VII of the Senate have expressed opinions provided,
which, however, contain numerous conditions under which the Ministry of Education would be
should follow the formal adoption of that plan.
Following these views with the comments
MIUR in cooperation with the Ministry of Economy and Finance should have considered the observations contained in the opinions and
provide
after the formal adoption of the Plan.
To date, however, that plan has not been formally adopted
.
On the basis of the "program plan", duly adopted after the acquisition of prescribed
opinions, the Government should have
issue the regulations referred to in art. 17, paragraph 2 of Law No 400/88,
looking at the following location:
a) proposal for the Ministry of Education in cooperation with the Ministry of Economy and Finance
.
b) Acquisition of the opinion of the Joint Conference under Legislative Decree n.
281/97.
c) Opinion of the State Council.
d) Resolution of the Council of Ministers.
Pending those proceedings, MIUR, on the basis of a draft regulation
, with the contested
the CM has given instructions for registration pupils for the school year 2009/2010;
these instructions, however, anticipate legislation still under development and are required by law
currently in force and with all the training organization
adopted in educational institutions and in particular the
POF of each school, as is known, it must take
before the school year.
It should also be noted that on 28.01.2009 the Conference
Unified art. 8 DL.vo No 281/97 made the required
opinion on the draft Regulation, it is clear from the opinion so that
clear majority of the regions have
ANCI negative opinion and with reference to the schema of
programmatic plan for both cuts in staff and co-presences,
for inclusive education.
addition, the date of 12/02/2009 National Council of PI
unanimously expressed a negative opinion on the draft Regulation
, stating in its conclusions, "which highlighted the critical
up a training framework that:
  It compromises the effectiveness of training in schools and early childhood
cycle of education;
  affects the dignity of public education;
  No offer equal opportunity and choice
throughout the country. "
The MIUR, despite these negative opinions has maintained that the contested
CM, in blatant violation of existing legislation, gives
mandatory provisions as if the regulation, still under development, was already in place
, however, as the draft rules, including the CM
contrasts with the pattern of the program plan.
(...)
In light of the above, briefly state it is clear that the Ministry
appeal with the CM did not limit himself to inform the families of
measures pending that could change
the attitude of the school system, but gave indications
operating as if such measures were already adopted and
were already binding and indeed has attached models of applications for registration
prepared in accordance with the legislation still being
adoption .
The applicants are parents of children who
In school year 2009/2010 will have to attend school and / or primary and
school teachers and primary , all interested in maintaining the current organizational structure

and primary school both in terms of teaching effectiveness, is also
for concrete work and family needs.
The contraction of school time, the abolition of co-presences,
the introduction of the teacher are prevalent
provided some of the interventions that have a very negative
teaching effectiveness and educational organization with the consequent contraction of even the
school staff.
LAW
The challenged acts are unlawful for the following REASONS

1) violation of constitutional principles and in particular Articles
. 3, 33 AND 34 COST. (...)
2) VIOLATION OF ARTICLE. No. 64, 25.6.2008 112
amended and converted into Law 06.08.2008 N. 133 E
VIOLATION OF ARTICLE. COST 97. (...)
3) VIOLATION OF ARTICLE. COST 97. AND EXCESS POWER FOR OBVIOUS INCONSISTENCY
'and injustice. (...)
4) declares that Article. 64, 3rd and 4th
PARAGRAPH OF DL 25.6.2008 N. 112, converted with amendments into Law 06.08.2008 N.
133 AND ART. 4
No. 9 DL 01/09/2008 137, L. C. TO IN 30/10/2008, N.
FOR VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 169. 77 AND 97 OF THE CONSTITUTION. (...)
5) VIOLATION OF ARTICLE. 3, 33 AND 34 COST.
ON THE PRINCIPLE OF SELF-EDUCATION STATE SYSTEM
. (...)
6) A BREACH OF THE PRINCIPLE OF AUTONOMY
SCHOOL OF ARTICLES. 33, PARAGRAPH 1 AND 117, PARAGRAPH 2
COST. AND ART. Presidential Decree No. 3 275/1999. (...)
7) VIOLATION OF ARTICLE. 4 DLN 133/08, C. L. TO IN 169/08 E
THE PRINCIPLE OF EQUALITY IN ART. 3 COST.
AND THE RIGHT TO EDUCATION IN THE ARTS. 33 and 34. (...)
8) declares that Article. 64, 3rd and 4th
PARAGRAPH OF DL 25.6.2008 N. 112, L. C. TO IN 06/08/2008 No 133 E
ART. 4 No DL 137/08 TO IN L. C. 169/08
FOR VIOLATION OF ARTICLES. 3, 70 97 E 117 of the Constitution.
ILLEGAL 'DERIVATIVE. (...)
9) declares that Article. 64, 3rd paragraph
OF DL 25.6.2008 N. 112, C. TO IN LN 133/08, WITH RESPECT
ART. 117, 3rd and 6th PARAGRAPH OF COST. (...) Application for suspension

The prima facie case is quite clear, the CM
it lacks any legal basis.
The danger in delay is also evident, as evidenced by the fact
news print most of the families called for the full-time basis to appeals
that CM is not only warranted, but is offered without
presence and therefore strongly
resized.
Finally it should be noted that the CM requires appeal to families with no choice
a certain proposal. PQM

It calls, following, where appropriate, referral to the Constitutional Court
the issue of unconstitutionality of art. 64, No DL
112, 2008, in L. c.to No And Article 133 of 06/10/1908. 4 of Decree 137/08
c.to in L. 30/10/2008 No 169 for violation of Art. 3, 33,
34, 70, 77, 97, 117 paragraph 2, 3 and 6, the acceptance of the appeal
consequent annulment of the contested measures with each
consequential effect of the victory of law and court fees.
(...) Rome, 12/03/2009

Example Ads Welcome New Employees

A NETWORK IN DEFENSE OF PUBLIC SCHOOL (2): The initiative "Open School" in Massa Marittima

Teachers and parents of the Comprehensive Massa Marittima organized a good initiative "School Open "in which to demonstrate the solid educational system provides the current result, which is likely to weaken and educational organization with the cuts imposed by the new rules. We give below an overview by the material used for this demonstration of the vitality of the public school, which does not give vitality to the weakening in place.

"Open School" - from 3 to 11 November 2008
In a time when the school is overwhelmed by an avalanche of confusing and contradictory statements that help to suppress it, almost as much as the cuts accounting Minister Tremonti, we offer a week in which Massa Marittima school opens with a series of initiatives, citizens, local institutions, associations and, above all, the boys
to reflect together on what we call today a modern system of education and training;
to publicize the professional resources that work to 'internal the school;
to bring into play its proactive approach, applying the well-established design experience.
The school, therefore, will be open
or part-time continued to emphasize that the timing of education and education are no time constraints, savings, but are lengthy, extended;
Ø with flexible structure of the activity, emphasize that the timing of the school are not as rigid as those of a factory, but they require flexibility in response to the needs and times of individuals in growth and formation of which she cares;
or for free, to emphasize that the value of the school is not measured in € ;
or in public buildings, to emphasize that the right to education is a primary right and that the Constitution stipulates that it is the duty of ensuring and enhancing a democratic state;
Ø with several contributions to stress that the public school system is in place which differences coexist, interact, complement each other.

"Open School" - from 23 to 28 February 2009
For ideal follow an open dialogue with students, families, citizens at the first week of "Open School" last December, we propose a new week, in which the doors of the School of Massa Marittima start to reflect on education and on the formation of the younger generation. We are comforted and sustained by the active contact with local authorities (by which we could organize conferences / public meetings last December) and the Parents' Committee, born during our first week of action.

"Open School" - May 25 to 30 weeks 2009Una of initiatives and activities to reflect on problems and prospects Italian schools: an opportunity for dialogue with students, families, citizens, organized by the Institute of Comprehensive Massa Marittima, in collaboration with the Parents' Committee and the Municipal Library. Among the activities: supervised study for students, pupils Cineforum Middle School, Conference on public school, middle school curriculum lessons, Peer Education, Picture Project "Human Rights", Opinion Journalism Laboratory School Middle School, Reading School of the animated ' Childhood, Reading animated Elementary School, Presentation of the book Magic in school Ardy G. Bassi, Readings in time to rock, Wise students of the Musical "Martin O." Massa Marittima

Watchingcheaters Korean Movie Free

A NETWORK IN DEFENSE OF PUBLIC SCHOOLS (1): INSTITUTE INCLUDING MASS MARITIME

We recently received a polite email from a professor of School of the Comprehensive Massa Marittima. Informs us that has been started, since last fall, in collaboration with a local infant Parents' Committee, a series of initiatives aimed at informing the citizens about what is happening to the Italian school. The following is a document drawn up by the teachers of the Institute, which explains the reasons for their actions, which are then essentially the same form that led to our Committee also Gecos.

Document approved by the Teaching Institute Comprehensive Massa Marittima, 27 / 10 / 2008
Regulatory intervention carried out and under construction, about school, arouse in us considerable concern because:
- a method has been used as the questionable use of decree-law (generally used for emergency measures), excluding any involvement in the world school in the intervention project;
- we can not find any ministerial action in education project, but sees in it only the will to reduce public expenditure;
- is no foundation to the equation: generalized reduction in school time and professional resources = better quality of service;
- the school time reduced and compressed for more classes in more numerous, will not be considered in a careful and effective all the specific needs that exist in each class: foreign students, disabled students, students with learning difficulties is also determined by social marginalization
- this time in school reduced and compressed will eventually take over the regular curriculum, excluding quickly the most innovative teaching methods, developed over years of experience in the field, consisting of projects, research and diversification strategies, based on the real needs of students and the diverse characteristics territorial
- the possible reduction of the Nursery School hour morning session only removes that type of school as having an educational and learning for children and puts in serious difficulties for many families where both parents work;
- can not be scared at the prospect of entry to school for many young teachers competent motivated and at risk of having to change their life plan and create the confusion that still exists uncertainty about the criteria for the award of merit to teachers;
are concerned about signs of authoritarian pedagogical model that belies the long and passionate history of a school welcoming caring, inclusive;
- it seems fair to ask the reflection of the adults (colleagues, parents, administrators, citizens) on the sensitive issues of education, asking: What future do we want for our children?

We believe that greater consideration of the voice strong criticism from us, school professionals, can dilute the risk of regulatory intervention in place and can at least stimulate the rethinking, calling on it to the attention of many people as possible.

33 Weeks Am I Feeling Babys Head In Upper Stomach

Press (4) - THE REFORMED SCHOOL = MORE 'MONEY FOR PRIVATE SCHOOLS

Corriere di Maremma - Corriere della Scuola "of May 19, 2009
THE CHAMBER ASKS FOR MORE 'FUNDS TO PRIVATE SCHOOLS
A bipartisan motion

While the executive size 8000000000 (And 134 000 persons) to public school, the Chamber engages in the coming months because the government increase funding to private schools. The promoters of the resolutions adopted at the session last May 6 knows that the economy minister, Giulio Tremonti, is preparing the Budget for 2010. Two of the three motions that have met the approval of Deputies of the classroom, in substance, first asking private schools to give back to the "ill-gotten gains" (read cut made by the Finance Act 2009) and, subsequently, to widen the purse strings . The need to support private schools, which are involved in the field the Catholic Church has made the House a fairly broad agreement that involved a piece of the opposition. The motion asks the government to "increase the resources allocated to the system equal" is signed by thirty Members of the PDL, the League and the Movement for the autonomy of Raffaele Lombardo.
The issue is approached from afar. We need to "implement measures-reads the text-to facilitate and promote the conditions for true freedom of choice of educational statai families between schools and equal." To "facilitate the educational choice of families" need "a specific legislative instrument, with additional resources state, put into special measures in support of freedom of choice in education "of parents italiani.I Members have a clear idea about it. The answer is given by "a mix of instruments such as vouchers to cover, in whole or in part, the costs of enrollment and attendance in private schools, tax deductions for families who enroll their children in private schools to an extent adequate to significantly reduce costs, a calibrated scale for families with lower incomes. " Applicants urge the government "to take steps to recover the missing resources for the funding situation at the private school for the financial year 2009, substantial amount to those awarded in fiscal 2008 ": about 500 million . Equal to the amount that managers seem insufficient and which could be increased by another 100 million.

Mozart Und Salieri Stream

Press (3) - THE REFORMED SCHOOL = LESS MONEY FOR EDUCATION PUBLIC

Corriere di Maremma - Corriere della Scuola "of March 3, 2009
POOR SCHOOL, ISTAT CONFIRMATION. ITALY IN EUROPE antepenultimate
The figure on the costs incurred by government

We are among the last in Europe. Taillights. The sad record is for the expenditure on education. The data was released two days ago by ISTAT in the annual report on "Expenditure by the Italian government to function. Only in Germany and Greece spending on education is lower percentage than in the UK, all other EU countries spend more than 15 states. The figure of 2007 and does not take account of the operation of the Berlusconi government that cuts mercilessly at school and university . But it is enough to explain since 2000 spending on public schools is declining . In Italy, more than two-thirds of the total expenditure is accounted for by Health, Social Protection and General Services. The latter is the largest expenditure ever: more than 135 billion euro (19.4% of total expenditure) in 2007, among the many paid activities, support to executive and legislative bodies and "the formulation, coordination and monitoring of development programs, global economic and social."
And school? All costs incurred by the State, regions and local authorities for education amounted to more than 71 billion. This figure might seem huge, but that is not so great. Of Health will spend 105 billion (13.6% of total expenditure), the Social Security (disability pensions, the disabled, sickness benefits and old age pensions, to name just a few items) 281 billion ( 37.3%) while 12 billion are intended for "recreational, cultural and religion." Today, the expenditure on education accounts for 9.6% of total spending. In 2000 close to 10%. If the expenditure is related to wealth (GDP) are at 4.7%, a level substantially similar to that of nine years fa.E in Europe? Things are different. The 15 EU countries on Education hijack an average of 10.5% of the total, a figure far closer to that advocated for Health (13.3) and General Services (14.9). And these figures for Italy, looks set to worsen . The budget cut the next three years the executive almost 8 billion to the school (almost all the staff) and over one and a half on campus.

Micky James And Trish Bra And Panty Match

Press (2) - THE REFORMED SCHOOL = less money for public schools

Corriere di Maremma February 28, 2009
"NOW WE ARE ALL IN CAGE. Presidia S'INCATENANO THE MINISTRY
The protest in Rome. And Gelmini announced that the cuts will fall

Other than the launch of the shoes made by some students a few days ago. Now, thirty principals chained themselves at the gates of the Ministry of Education. Mobilization different from those that have seen thousands of students besiege the quadrilateral Viale Trastevere. Why they decided to give life to an act so extreme? The ministry has cleared the 73 million euro for current expenditure of schools. No toilet paper, cleaning supplies, but also substitutes for the short and meager compensation for the commissioners who will take part in committees of maturity. Zero euro also pay visits to local health insurance tax prof. Principals arrived in Rome from all regions to ask the minister Gelmini not to cripple the public schools, only in 2009, lost 427 million € for normal operation : in addition to paper copies, the plans to offer training, courses of recovery for the debts of the school students for payment to companies cleaning and staff training.
A cut with the addition of more than half a billion euro of cuts accumulated in recent years. "We are here to prove that the Italian schools have been reduced in chains," said Armando Catalano, national coordinator of the school principals from FLC-CGIL. "The schools-more-Catalano no longer have the money to call the deputies or to pay the chalk, because for the first time were forced to make budget without the funds for normal operation." Catalano, chained to his colleagues, have also complained about the extra burden for schools, resulting in his view, the full cost that the institutes have to bear the obligation, introduced by Minister Brunetta, to submit to visit the tax employees for even one day of absence. "For the first time we have to pay as a school-specific explanations money not yet been transferred." But by the Ministry of signals coming of peace. After an hour of face-to-face meeting between the Director-General for the Ministry of Education resources head Sunday, the National Coordinator Deans FLC-CGIL Armando Catalano, the secretary of the FLC-CGIL Gianna Fracassi, the head of the administrative and financial FLC-CGIL Anna Maria Santoro and the two head teachers from Frosinone and John Carlini Federico Maruccelli from Florence. The ministry said Catalano, reassured the union on some issues like the school supply teachers: "You can appoint an alternate-ha Catalan-reported even if no money because the contribution of substitutes means ensuring the right to study and can not be optional. " Links to the Ministry of Education is committed to spreading a note of clarification to school principals. The ministry has also given assurances to the inter-institutional visits to the fiscal and administrative operation. On the latter point, the ministry has undertaken to draw up a plan within 10 days. "We found a great sensitivity in head-Director General added Catalan-we do not know if the same feeling we'll find it at a higher level." In the afternoon he addressed the national secretary of the Federation knowledge workers of the CGIL union: "The meeting this morning between the FLC-CGIL and the Ministry of Education has received a first-parzialissimo substitutes and survey results on tax, but remain open every nodes. We have ensured that the 126 million relating to supply teachers of 2007 will be transferred and that the Ministry of Education will clarify in a statement that the substitutes and a survey of fiscal expenditure to be incurred as mandatory, although there is the problem of covering . Minister Gelmini arriving signals truce: "It was a maneuver planned workforce reduction of approximately 45 thousand teachers, but the figures will be downsized because there are many requests for retirement, then the reduction is expected to fall to just over 30 thousand. The same applies to non-teaching staff: it was expected a cut of 12 thousand people in the workforce, now the real cuts will be 6 thousand. "

Venyl Floors In Rabbit Cage

Press (1) - THE REFORMED SCHOOL COMPUTER

Here are some newspaper articles in recent months, concerning the nefarious consequences of the innovations introduced with the new rules badged Gelmini.

Corriere di Maremma - Corriere della Scuola "of February 24, 2009
GOODBYE TO THE THREE" I ". DISAPPEAR FROM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INTERNET
The rumor on the ministry

The three "I" morattiana memory? Forget them as well. The cuts on the government school are In fact, eliminating one of the fundamental pillars of the much-debated Moratti reform: that of the three "I" in English, Business, Internet or IT. Starting next school year, in fact, teachers at the elementary school (now primary) and the media will have to jump through hoops to open the world of computer knowledge to their students. The so-called cut-presences in primary schools and the reduction of hours of technology in the secondary school level almost impossible to make the teaching of the first principles of Informatics and the Internet to children and teenagers. This is confirmed by the Ministry of Education, which these days has opened a dialog on reform with parents and teachers.
The so-called "FAQ" (Frequently asked questions ie, the most frequently asked questions) on the website of the Ministry show that parents and teachers are quite confused. "With cutting-presences, my son can continue to make the Laboratory for Computer Science?" Asks a parent.
The naive question calls for a ministerial response to the technicians at least unexpected. " The reduction in hours-of-presence reads the FAQ number 23 - will involve some reorganization (...) We hope that the computer lab to find a place among the activities, also if you would agree that it is not, especially in primary school, a teaching or priority. "From next September the school will primary modular organization, with three teachers in two classes, the" single master reference " . The move will clear the hours of presence and all activities related thereto: remedial courses and study, computer laboratories, supply teachers, etc.. With the modules, in fact, the 54 hours per week of two classes running at 27 hours are covered by three teachers who provide 18 hours of class per person. The remainder of the weekly teacher's (4 hours) are used to expand the provision of training or plug the holes of absent colleagues. But in a few months all this will "cut" . Much the same middle school where the first computer science are taught by the teacher to the children of technology because, again from September, the number of hours of discipline will be reduced by 33 percent.